Is it a bad idea to stop commenting function signatures relying on generative AI explanations instead

0 votes
With the help of code examples can you tell me Is it a bad idea to stop commenting function signatures, relying on generative AI explanations instead?
Feb 13 in Generative AI by Nidhi
• 11,780 points
39 views

No answer to this question. Be the first to respond.

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
0 votes

Relying solely on generative AI explanations instead of commenting function signatures can be risky, as AI-generated descriptions may be inconsistent, lack context, or be unavailable during development

Here is the code snippet you can refer to:

In the above code we are using the following points:

  • Explicit Documentation: The well-commented function clearly explains parameters, return values, and purpose.
  • Self-Sufficiency: Developers can understand function usage without relying on AI.
  • Prevents Misinterpretation: Avoids incorrect assumptions AI might make based on incomplete context.
  • Enhances Code Readability: Especially useful for team projects and future maintenance.
Hence, stopping function signature comments and relying solely on AI explanations is a bad idea, as it can reduce clarity, hinder offline development, and lead to misinterpretations—manual documentation remains crucial.
answered Feb 13 by ninu

edited Mar 6

Related Questions In Generative AI

0 votes
1 answer
webinar REGISTER FOR FREE WEBINAR X
REGISTER NOW
webinar_success Thank you for registering Join Edureka Meetup community for 100+ Free Webinars each month JOIN MEETUP GROUP